基于红外和可见光图像融合的绝缘子故障识别

Insulator Fault Recognition Based on Fusion of Infrared and Visible Light Images

  • 摘要: 为了解决传统的绝缘子故障检测方法不能全面捕捉细节和小目标检测性能差的问题,提出了一种基于双流注意机制的生成对抗网络(Deep Supervised Attention Generative Adversarial Network,DSAGAN)和YOLOv8的绝缘子故障识别方法。通过DSAGAN对绝缘子红外图像和可见光图像进行融合,在生成对抗网络(Generative Adversarial Network,GAN)的生成器中引入注意力机制增强融合特征来改进融合质量,GAN的生成器与判别器得到的结果互相竞争而形成对抗网络,并采用最小二乘法(Least Squares,LS)代替交叉熵损失作为DSAGAN的损失函数,以保留更多图像细节,增强DSAGAN的稳定性。采用YOLOv8目标检测算法对融合后的图像进行故障识别。实验表明:通过DSAGAN融合后的绝缘子图像的5个评价指标均高于其他7种融合方案;YOLOv8目标检测算法对绝缘子破损、闪络、玻璃损耗、聚合物污秽的检测平均精确率mAP@0.5和mAP@0.5:0.95分别达到了0.917和0.639,相比于YOLOv5分别提高了0.026和0.08。融合图像在不同绝缘子故障的识别率均高于单一的红外或可见光图像,平均识别率达到了93%,相比红外和可见光分别提高了6.25和4.5个百分点。

     

    Abstract: To address the limitations of traditional insulator fault detection methods: specifically the inadequate capture of details and poor performance in identifying small targets, a novel dual-stream attention-based approach is proposed. This method combines a deep supervised attention generative adversarial network (DSAGAN) with the YOLOv8 object detection algorithm. In the proposed DSAGAN, infrared and visible light images of insulators are fused using an attention mechanism embedded within the generator of the generative adversarial network (GAN) to enhance fusion quality. The generator and discriminator form an adversarial network, where the least squares (LS) loss function is employed instead of the conventional cross-entropy loss. This substitution helps preserve finer image details and improves the stability of the DSAGAN. The fused images are then subjected to fault detection using the YOLOv8 object detection algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the five evaluation indexes of the insulator images fused by DSAGAN outperform those of seven other fusion methods. YOLOv8 object detection algorithm achieves a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.917 and 0.639 for detecting insulator damages, flashovers, glass losses, and polymer contaminations at thresholds of 0.5 and 0.5 to 0.95, respectively, representing improvements of 0.026 and 0.08 compared to YOLOv5. Furthermore, the fault recognition rates of fused images for different types of insulator faults surpass those of single infrared or visible light images. The average recognition rate reaches 93%, marking improvements of 6.25% and 4.5% over infrared and visible light images, respectively.

     

/

返回文章
返回